Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: Universidad, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. Correspondence to Edson Servan-Mori email:
Enroll in the Global Health Research Certificate Program Measuring Poverty and Poverty Scorecards It can be quite difficult to determine which people in a given community live below the poverty line.
People who are poor frequently do not have documentation of their savings or purchases. This article discusses why it is important to measure poverty, elucidates a variety of methods that have previously been used to measure poverty, and discusses poverty scorecards, a practical and effective way to measure poverty.
In low- and middle-income countries, understanding poverty levels is important for generating policy, targeting development initiatives, and monitoring and evaluating economic progress over time. First, it focuses exclusively on income and consumption.
It fails to take into account other issues of poverty beyond income, such as severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and access to social services.
Federal Poverty Line The poverty line in the U. She determined that in the s the average family spent one-third of its budget on food, so she set the poverty line at roughly three Measuring financial health the amount of basic food costs.
Though this number has been updated to account for inflation, the same s formula is still Measuring financial health to determine the poverty line. This method is useful because it incorporates changes in median income.
For example, as the overall wealth of a society increases, so would the poverty level. However, the fact that this method reflects the country's overall income distribution is also a weakness since changes in the poverty rate may not reflect actual changes.
For example, when Ireland flourished economically in the late s, their poverty rate, paradoxically, did so as well. He developed the scorecards to address many of the problems inherent in measuring poverty, such as cost, time, and accuracy.
Schreiner realized that direct measures are costly, time-consuming, and hard to verify. How much did they cost? On the other hand, indirect scoring costs less, can be completed in minutes per household, and is more accurate and more easily verified. So if we know the roof is straw, we gain little - in terms of measuring poverty - from checking whether there is indoor plumbing.
He excluded indicators that relied on total value of assets, annual expenditures, or subjective judgments. He then assigned each indicator a point value. When the points from each indicator are added up, the total gives a poverty score, which ranges from 0 being the most poor and being the least poor.
The score then corresponds with the probability that a household is poor. The Poverty Scorecards can be accessed at www. Each poverty scorecard is unique and asks about indicators specific to the target country. Poverty scorecards are an effective and practical way to assess and identify poverty because each scorecard contains ten simple indicators that field workers can collect and use to compute poverty scores in real time.
The scorecard is one page, concise, and asks questions that provide simple responses. This score would then be used to estimate the poverty likelihood associated with that score. For Ecuador, the likelihood of being below the poverty line according to household score is represented in the following table.
Thus, a score of 33 would mean that the household has a Therefore, the likelihood of a household being below the poverty line for a given score is not the same across countries.
Instead, it is derived from data from each individual country. This is particularly useful for organizations that want to know what share of its participants are below a poverty line, to determine the progress of projects related to the new Sustainable Development Goals, and for organizations that might want to report how many of its participants are among the poorest half of those living below the poverty line this is required of USAID microenterprise partners.
Track changes in poverty over time. Enable aid and microfinance organizations to target services for program purposes to specific populations. Their primary objective is to empower local community members to help improve the management and delivery of basic services and to identify their needs.
The RSPs recently used a poverty scorecard for Pakistan developed by Mark Schreiner to measure change in poverty and to support the development of microfinance organizations in the area.
One indicator reflects poverty risk, by measuring education level, residence, and household size, while the other reflects change in household poverty by measuring household assets, transport assets, meat consumption, and sweet consumption. By using non-economic indicators, Prizma ensures the accuracy of its measurements because clients are less likely to misrepresent non-income data, especially demographic data that is easy to verify.
Points are given for each indicator, and poverty is assessed on a scale ofwith 0 being the most poor, and 9 being the least poor.
Though it may seem as simple as a cursory glance at a bank statement, measuring the financial well-being of your company is actually far more complex. A company's bottom line profit margin is the best single indicator of its financial health and long-term viability. Investors are constantly searching for . A balance sheet or cash flow statement can offer an at-a-glance view of your business’s financial initiativeblog.comg into the numbers a little further, however, is sometimes necessary to get a clearer picture of how well your business is faring.
The scale helps Prizma assess the relative need of each of their households. For example, a household that has a total score of one can clearly be said to be poorer that a household with a score of four.
The scorecard also enables staff to generate reports on client household poverty status, which enables the organization to segment its clientele, provide improved and efficient service, track dropout rate by poverty status, and adapt their services to the developmental needs of poorer clients.
In Bolivia, Pro-Mujer offers group-based loans and savings programs to overclients. The organization wanted to determine how effectively their loans reduced poverty in Bolivia. Those families who were deemed poor scoring under 50 points on the scorecard received loans.Measuring Radiation There are four different but interrelated units for measuring radioactivity, exposure, absorbed dose, and dose equivalent.
7 Figure 1: Performance measurement within the health and safety management system Providing information The primary purpose of measuring health and safety perf ormance is to provide information on the progress and current status of the strategies.
In recent years, data sources for financial inclusion have become richer yet more complicated to navigate. On the demand side, there are numerous sources: The Global Findex was released in ; there are various country-level surveys like FinScope, FinAccess and the Financial Inclusion Tracker Survey (FITS) just to name a few.
Apr 14, · What's measured is what matters. To support innovative providers that value consumer financial health, CFSI has identified eight key indicators. A balance sheet or cash flow statement can offer an at-a-glance view of your business’s financial initiativeblog.comg into the numbers a little further, however, is sometimes necessary to get a clearer picture of how well your business is faring.
Most Wall Street analysts and investors tend to focus on return on equity as their primary measure of company performance. Many executives focus heavily on this metric as well, recognizing that it.